Walking on air and sunshine thought experiment

Walking on air and sunshine

ABOUT TURBULENCE:

The following is a thought experiment:

• One way of getting a constant:
• If you know the mass of the moon, then compute the following:
• Get Earth's size which we do not know yet since it includes an unknown variable, but set it at 10 say.
• This means Earth with atmosphere.
• Call it m.
• Now: forget about this.

How MUCH does light way? What is light, a photon? IT IS NOT A PHOTON.

Light is is a { ray, particle } = W{air}.

W{"Earth"} is Earth's G.

W("Air on Earth"} is a functional fraction of Earth's elements.

RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING:

• Given our variables, set a time Tx(1).
• Weight gravity of an object. IE. 'scaling'.
• The weigh of the scale should change anytime aka every moment.
• What is the highest resolution we can weigh aka weighing interval.
• The lowest we can get is a description of a variable like: "W factor".
• set T(c) = 0 aka coffee time.
• Now double it: set 2*T(c) as a variable function return value.
• So what equals T(c) = 0 = 2*T(c)?

RESOLVED i think.

SO SINCE WE CANNOT THINK WITHIN THOUGHT_CREATION_TIME=0, SINCE IT COSTS TIME TO REALIZE A THOUGH, TRY THINKING OF THIS:

• Think of your name as M=1
• Do it again aka M=2.

So TURBULENCE being a higher function of weight and mass (DO YOU GET NOW WHY WEIGHT IS NOT MASS?); wait, let me explain that,

    

    Weight is mass interfering with observation.

Once known, resolve above variables.

Take one measurement at T(c+1) and compute:

    2*T(c) = [T(0), T(1)]

UNDERSTOOD?

This is my ESPRESSO THEORY.

NOW make me an espresso machine please. Oh wait it existed already? Nobody knows what it does? Dont physicist drink coffee? Its made with copper. Could've just weighed the machine and weigh the resulting espresso coffee with known pressure inside the coffee machine, and devised it as: HOW MUCH AIR DID IT CONSUME vs a closed lab room with known air pressure WITHIN an air sealed room.

Yes?

P.S. This might mean we can KNOW how much a light particle weighs. Since a ray is weighless, in theory. BUT MAYBE IT IS NOT. ACTUALLY this is known as weighing rays.

OR:

Walking on sunshine

Continuing the thought experiment, there should be possible states in a wave on which particles are dense, and we can LEAP to them from one particle inside a ray to another particle in a ray which is known as WAVE WALKING AKA SURFING.

California dreamin' 

So the "California state" or c-state or the question: IS LIGHT A PARTICLE OR A RAY is weighed by this.And thus weighing anything with a scale, is ON A SCALE.

SO A SCALE IS 2D. COMPUTE c=2 from ANYTHING with E = mc^2 theory.

THE REST FOLLOWS.

WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE MASS OF A LIGHT WAVE. COMPUTE FOR WEIGHT = {RAY, PARTICLE} AND RESOLVE.

We've got what is known as the BEAN value for light. Or B. This is it's "Though experimental mass" value. Now recompute with this variable and resolve the GROWING factor of a BEAN. 

NOW:

RESOLVE FOR BEAN*GROWING a t(q).

NOW:

RESOLVE FOR BEAN * GROWING a t(1+q)

Now, what is this?

It means its ESPRESSO TIME.

WHICH IS COFFEE TIME.

Hence, coffee is turbulent at given times [t=0,t=1].

And that's it I think?

E = mc^2, so E{"light", "light"} is what's known as its Energy definition.

Compute for a certain set of mc^2.

Get SOMETHING with a known mass, it being set to 1 kg. 

WEIGHT IT WITH DIFFERENT LIGHTS ON A SCALE WHILE MONITORING ENERGY CONSUMPTION.

YOU HAVE THE WEIGHT OF LIGHT MASS.

RESOLVE THE E = mc^2 equation.

or experiment as follows: 1*c^2 = E.

MEASURE ANYTHING, IF YOU PROVIDE IT WITH ENERGY OVER TIME, SEE HOW MUCH WEIGHT INCREASES AND OR DECREASES OVER TIME, AND THAT IS THE WEIGHT OF A WAVE.

DONE.

SO PHILOSOPHICALLY SPEAKING: WITH THIS EQUATION, 

EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE TO 1 CONSTANT. 

Pro tip: measure as much as you can about 1 thing....... and set its measured values to 1, and measure in ideal conditions. THE REST IS RELATIVE.